#UAP in Spain 1995 Minolta Alpha Camera-Kodachrome film*
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected.
In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww +++++++++++++++++++++
In general, UFO photos are blurred out? Is it because there
is still no UFO photo in focus? If there is, it will be
recovered by the Pentagon, right?
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
In the original image of UFO, it is quite small and hard to
see.
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ Are real UFO photos unpopular with high-resolution
processing? Conversely, if you do low-resolution processing,
access jumps tenfold? Fake UFO photos are popular w Is
this the same as a UFO researcher not owning a single photo
of a real UFO?
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ The reason why UFOs and UAPs, which are called "space junk",
do not come out is that even if a photographer takes them,
they are treated as "ghosts" and thrown away as "garbage". This "UFO" was also found in the "garbage film" 25 years
フォトログ表示
