Modern pictures are completed with digital data on the computer.One-ness Classical technique photography consists of an amalog camera, film, and finally on paper #-X-76 https://youtu.be/3rNDeKmWt_U
#UAP in Spain 1995 Minolta Alpha Camera-Kodachrome film*
The UFO was called #Flying Saucer, but this UAP is probably a #Flying Cup, no matter how you look at it.
At the bottom of the object, a layer of atmosphere like a force field is formed. # UAP
The actual color of the UAP shot on Kodachrome film is unknown. This is because older scanners do not analyze Kodachrome.
#UAP announced by the US Department of Defense A 35mm reversal image taken more clearly and three-dimensionally? Is it metallic and has a hollow structure in the center? A streak pattern can be seen on the body of the object. https://youtu.be/y0i-PLDyMBQ
Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected.
In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww
フォトログ表示
