This is a UAP shot with a film camera. However, since no one has succeeded in shooting UAP yet, is it impossible to prove? Or rather, no one has seen it? Even in the US military, the main body has not succeeded yet, just by shooting the shadow of UAP.
********************************************** The history of science is the history of alchemy, and the history of lies is also ww So can't you trust it until you confirm it yourself? Did you confirm the existence of UAP by leaving it on the film? Well, even in the US Navy, it's only monochrome shooting, so ww color shooting may be the first time in history?
"Experiment" ... Real UAP image, {UFO, UA SNS of groups and individuals who saw P, research, etc.} Stick it on and see the reaction. Progress to the present …… Almost no reaction www Is it so brainwashed by the media?
********************************************** Image usage fee US $ 100 Amazon Gift Code
*********************************************
UAP is always wrapped in force field, so it is difficult to shoot w Even with the US Navy Top Gun, even if you say "I see it almost every day", when I look at the image, there is a lot of out-of-focus w At the angle of the sun , The moment the main body was miraculously seen through, I was able to shoot ww
Did the Pentagon's UAP-approved, alien search make sense? In other words, aliens do not come to the earth, are they only monitoring with UAP probes?
///////////////////////////////////////////////// Unidentified flying object eyewitnesses are those who witnessed and filmed an unidentified flying object. UFO researchers and others are those who have not witnessed or filmed.
Interestingly, when the photos of the unidentified flying object were published, there was no response from UFO researchers. So the government doesn't have to cover up.
UFOs with a fairly old film camera. Minolta Alpha 9000, Spain trip, UFO over Girona Cathedral. Film is more sensitive in the infrared region than digital.
フォトログ表示
