++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Even with UAP, sharp images will not come out w You are cheated by infrared shadow puppets w
UAP's powerful weapon is the force field from objects. Even if a submarine collides, it will not break.
US10322827B2 - High frequency gravitational wave generator - ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected.
In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww ++++++++++++++++++++++++
UFOs and UAPs have been witnessed and filmed all over the world,
Unfortunately, most of them were shot with a toy camera, It only captures the light around UFO_UAP. That's probably because most of them were shot at night. So, if you can take a clear image, its value is From $ 100,000 to $ 1 million.
Are there aliens malicious and bystanders? At least there are no good ones?
Vintage photos are mostly monochrome, with very few color prints.
In the case of color, it will be faded after 30 years. Therefore,
I made organic pigments as color formers. Moreover, the dot type will be the world's first.
########
US10322827B2 - High frequency gravitational wave generator - ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even thougAre there aliens malicious and bystanders? At least there are no good ones? h it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected.
In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww +++++++++++++++++++++++ Are there aliens malicious and bystanders? At least there are no good ones?
This is a UAP shot with a film camera. However, since no one has succeeded in shooting UAP yet, is it impossible to prove? Or rather, no one has seen it? Even in the US military, the main body has not succeeded yet, just by shooting the shadow of UAP.
********************************************** The history of science is the history of alchemy, and the history of lies is also ww So can't you trust it until you confirm it yourself? Did you confirm the existence of UAP by leaving it on the film? Well, even in the US Navy, it's only monochrome shooting, so ww color shooting may be the first time in history?
"Experiment" ... Real UAP image, {UFO, UA SNS of groups and individuals who saw P, research, etc.} Stick it on and see the reaction. Progress to the present …… Almost no reaction www Is it so brainwashed by the media?
**********************************************
Image usage fee US $ 100 Amazon Gift Code
*********************************************
UAP is always wrapped in force field, so it is difficult to shoot w Even with the US Navy Top Gun, even if you say "I see it almost every day", when I look at the image, there is a lot of out-of-focus w At the angle of the sun , The moment the main body was miraculously seen through, I was able to shoot ww
Did the Pentagon's UAP-approved, alien search make sense? In other words, aliens do not come to the earth, are they only monitoring with UAP probes?
/////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Members of the UAP Task Force are having a hard time getting cooperation from the Air Force." ... So far, only the U.S. Navy and the Pentagon have acknowledged the UAP phenomenon? UAP report from the U.S. Air Force Is there no case? My camera is $900. Still, I will take a picture so far. US Air Force cameras cost $900,000. What kind of UFO have you photographed? ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
Early satellites could not avoid persistent cloud cover. Similarly, UFOs are hidden behind persistent cloud cover. However, in daylight, the entity can sometimes be seen through.
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ Infrared light has the characteristic of being easier to pass through the spatial absorption band than visible light, so it is effective for grasping UFOs hidden behind it.
The reason why unidentified flying objects cannot be photographed well with a digital camera is that they have a strong infrared cut filter. Film cameras can shoot well because they don't have it.
フォトログ表示
