I used a technique that does not use a camera for classical technique.
Make it with black and white negative film. Coloring printing method. It
is not a commercially available color print system.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Even with UAP, sharp images will not come out w You are cheated by infrared shadow puppets w
UAP's powerful weapon is the force field from objects. Even if a submarine collides, it will not break.
US10322827B2 - High frequency gravitational wave generator - ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected.
In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww ++++++++++++++++++++++++ The fact that the United States has approved UAP means that manned UAP may have been successful, that is, it is meaningless to carry out the Artemis program, which allows it to pass through the Van Allen belt unscathed.
++++++++++++++++++++++++ Landing a NASA-developed UAP on an asteroid, using gravity lessen or gyro navigation to deflect its orbit or make a soft landing on any surface? In other words, can you develop planetary resources? ++++++++++++++++++++++++
UAP that can realize a planetary missile that can be guided to any point on the earth
In fact, unidentified flying objects, UAPs, etc. in books are not captured in the photographs. U.S. Navy UAP data may have been tampered with? *************************** Is the real UAP image not coming out because the Pentagon is buying it? If so, will this image be bought for $ 100,000? Please pay by Paypal for the transfer.
***************************
In general, UFO photos are blurred out? Is it because there
is still no UFO photo in focus? If there is, it will be
recovered by the Pentagon, right?
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
In the original image of UFO, it is quite small and hard to
see.
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ Are real UFO photos unpopular with high-resolution
processing? Conversely, if you do low-resolution processing,
access jumps tenfold? Fake UFO photos are popular w Is
this the same as a UFO researcher not owning a single photo
of a real UFO?
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ The reason why UFOs and UAPs, which are called "space junk",
do not come out is that even if a photographer takes them,
they are treated as "ghosts" and thrown away as "garbage". This "UFO" was also found in the "garbage film" 25 years
ago.4th Air Surveillance and Rosas Air Area (EVA 4) ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
Is the UFO's flight energy... a quantization of the
electromagnetic field? Can you see the translucent field at
the bottom of the UFO? You can't see it at the top. In other
words, the thick field acts as anti-gravity, right? So you
think the US military is already building UFOs? Are you
running it in fighter training?
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
Does this UFO photo capture the world's first power field?
Related to promoting UFOs? As such, the Pentagon has
classified more than 100 "UFO photographs" as top secret.
And only the leaked infrared video was released www
In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww ++++++++++++++++++++++++ The fact that the United States has approved UAP means that manned UAP may have been successful, that is, it is meaningless to carry out the Artemis program, which allows it to pass through the Van Allen belt unscathed.
++++++++++++++++++++++++ Landing a NASA-developed UAP on an asteroid, using gravity lessen or gyro navigation to deflect its orbit or make a soft landing on any surface? In other words, can you develop planetary resources? ++++++++++++++++++++++++
UAP that can realize a planetary missile that can be guided to any point on the earth
In fact, unidentified flying objects, UAPs, etc. in books are not captured in the photographs. U.S. Navy UAP data may have been tampered with? ***************************
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ The reason why UFOs and UAPs, which are called "space junk", do not come out is that even if a photographer takes them, they are treated as "ghosts" and thrown away as "garbage". This "UFO" was also found in the "garbage film" 25 years ago.4th Air Surveillance and Rosas Air Area (EVA 4) ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
Is the UFO's flight energy... a quantization of the electromagnetic field? Can you see the translucent field at the bottom of the UFO? You can't see it at the top. In other words, the thick field acts as anti-gravity, right? So you think the US military is already building UFOs? Are you running it in fighter training?
フォトログ表示
