++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Even with UAP, sharp images will not come out w You are cheated by infrared shadow puppets w
UAP's powerful weapon is the force field from objects. Even if a submarine collides, it will not break.
US10322827B2 - High frequency gravitational wave generator - ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected.
In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww ++++++++++++++++++++++++
UFOs and UAPs have been witnessed and filmed all over the world,
Unfortunately, most of them were shot with a toy camera, It only captures the light around UFO_UAP. That's probably because most of them were shot at night. So, if you can take a clear image, its value is From $ 100,000 to $ 1 million.
Are there aliens malicious and bystanders? At least there are no good ones?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected.
In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww ++++++++++++++++++++++++
########
Vintage photos are mostly monochrome, with very few color prints.
In the case of color, it will be faded after 30 years. Therefore,
I made organic pigments as color formers. Moreover, the dot type will be the world's first.
########
For my printing technique The material of silk printing is being used for my printing technique. Material is waterproof paper, a sensitization agent, acetic acid vinyl, Y.M.C.K. pigments, etc. With an ultraviolet ray exposure machine, about eight sheets are exposed using a long-tone or short tone film etc. from one sheet, and development processing is carried out only with water. It is very easy.
# This, analog pigment print method, # From shooting the film, inverted, creating a positive film ...
The composition is YOUTUBE video link, original photo, Three points of the original text. ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ UAP experiment Part 1. Is it real if UFO researchers react to real UAP images? Mostly fake and government-intentioned? ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
Most of the self-proclaimed UFO researchers are fake w Or rather, are you obsessed with the government? The rationale is real UAP photos, and if you retweet, most of them are unresponsive. Because they have never seen real UAPs or photos ww ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
The composition is YOUTUBE video link, original photo, Three points of the original text. ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ UAP experiment Part 1. Is it real if UFO researchers react to real UAP images? Mostly fake and government-intentioned? ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
Most of the self-proclaimed UFO researchers are fake w Or rather, are you obsessed with the government? The rationale is real UAP photos, and if you retweet, most of them are unresponsive. Because they have never seen real UAPs or photos ww ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
The concept of vintage printing is already ww It's because digital pigment prints came out. That is, an original print is input to a personal computer, and a digital print is outputted as a finished product. Still, the original print is a worthwhile ww ＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃
フォトログ表示
