・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ If you tweet a real UFO picture to a UFO researcher... most of them don't show any interest lol. So does that mean most researchers are fakes? Real UFO pictures are useful for exposing fake researchers lol. :://////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Why are there no UFO images in the world? o Cameras themselves have switched to digital, and their performance has deteriorated drastically compared to film cameras lol o Considering the probability of photographing a UFO, you don't make any money from it lol If you had to put a price on it, it would be about 100 million yen per shot lol
The concept of vintage printing is already ww It's because digital pigment prints came out. That is, an original print is input to a personal computer, and a digital print is outputted as a finished product. Still, the original print is a worthwhile ww ＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃
This is a UAP shot with a film camera. However, since no one has succeeded in shooting UAP yet, is it impossible to prove? Or rather, no one has seen it? Even in the US military, the main body has not succeeded yet, just by shooting the shadow of UAP.
********************************************** The history of science is the history of alchemy, and the history of lies is also ww So can't you trust it until you confirm it yourself? Did you confirm the existence of UAP by leaving it on the film? Well, even in the US Navy, it's only monochrome shooting, so ww color shooting may be the first time in history?
"Experiment" ... Real UAP image, {UFO, UA SNS of groups and individuals who saw P, research, etc.} Stick it on and see the reaction. Progress to the present …… Almost no reaction www Is it so brainwashed by the media?
********************************************** Does the combination of Minolta Alpha 9000 and Kodakurom 200 film surpass the 500,000 yen digital camera? Does the 0.8mm UAP image exceed the limit of the microscope? Is it impossible to analyze the image of this film without a scope of 1 million yen?
This is a UAP shot with a film camera. However, since no one has succeeded in shooting UAP yet, is it impossible to prove? Or rather, no one has seen it? Even in the US military, the main body has not succeeded yet, just by shooting the shadow of UAP.
********************************************** The history of science is the history of alchemy, and the history of lies is also ww So can't you trust it until you confirm it yourself? Did you confirm the existence of UAP by leaving it on the film? Well, even in the US Navy, it's only monochrome shooting, so ww color shooting may be the first time in history? ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ If you tweet a real UFO picture to a UFO researcher... most of them don't show any interest lol. So does that mean most researchers are fakes? Real UFO pictures are useful for exposing fake researchers lol. :://////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Why are there no UFO images in the world? o Cameras themselves have switched to digital, and their performance has deteriorated drastically compared to film cameras lol o Considering the probability of photographing a UFO, you don't make any money from it lol If you had to put a price on it, it would be about 100 million yen per shot lol
"Experiment" ... Real UAP image, {UFO, UA SNS of groups and individuals who saw P, research, etc.} Stick it on and see the reaction. Progress to the present …… Almost no reaction www Is it so brainwashed by the media?
**********************************************
US $ 100 Amazon Gift Code
*********************************************
UAP is always wrapped in force field, so it is difficult to shoot w Even with the US Navy Top Gun, even if you say "I see it almost every day", when I look at the image, there is a lot of out-of-focus w At the angle of the sun , The moment the main body was miraculously seen through, I was able to shoot ww
Did the Pentagon's UAP-approved, alien search make sense? In other words, aliens do not come to the earth, are they only monitoring with UAP probes? ////////////// Unidentified flying object eyewitnesses are those who witnessed and filmed an unidentified flying object. UFO researchers and others are those who have not witnessed or filmed.
Interestingly, when the photos of the unidentified flying object were published, there was no response from UFO researchers. So the government doesn't have to cover up.
UFOs with a fairly old film camera. Minolta Alpha 9000, Spain trip, UFO over Girona Cathedral. Film is more sensitive in the infrared region than digital.
The concept of vintage printing is already ww It's because digital pigment prints came out. That is, an original print is input to a personal computer, and a digital print is outputted as a finished product. Still, the original print is a worthwhile ww ＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃
This is a UAP shot with a film camera. However, since no one has succeeded in shooting UAP yet, is it impossible to prove? Or rather, no one has seen it? Even in the US military, the main body has not succeeded yet, just by shooting the shadow of UAP.
********************************************** The history of science is the history of alchemy, and the history of lies is also ww So can't you trust it until you confirm it yourself? Did you confirm the existence of UAP by leaving it on the film? Well, even in the US Navy, it's only monochrome shooting, so ww color shooting may be the first time in history?
フォトログ表示
