・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ If you tweet a real UFO picture to a UFO researcher... most of them don't show any interest lol. So does that mean most researchers are fakes? Real UFO pictures are useful for exposing fake researchers lol. :://////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Why are there no UFO images in the world? o Cameras themselves have switched to digital, and their performance has deteriorated drastically compared to film cameras lol o Considering the probability of photographing a UFO, you don't make any money from it lol If you had to put a price on it, it would be about 100 million yen per shot lol
This is a UAP shot with a film camera. However, since no one has succeeded in shooting UAP yet, is it impossible to prove? Or rather, no one has seen it? Even in the US military, the main body has not succeeded yet, just by shooting the shadow of UAP.
********************************************** The history of science is the history of alchemy, and the history of lies is also ww So can't you trust it until you confirm it yourself? Did you confirm the existence of UAP by leaving it on the film? Well, even in the US Navy, it's only monochrome shooting, so ww color shooting may be the first time in history?
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ If you tweet a real UFO picture to a UFO researcher... most of them don't show any interest lol. So does that mean most researchers are fakes? Real UFO pictures are useful for exposing fake researchers lol. :://////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Why are there no UFO images in the world? o Cameras themselves have switched to digital, and their performance has deteriorated drastically compared to film cameras lol o Considering the probability of photographing a UFO, you don't make any money from it lol If you had to put a price on it, it would be about 100 million yen per shot lol
Pigment photography production is surprisingly . However, as there are many variable elements, like the normal picture, you can not always make the same thing. That's where the interest is divided. This is a photo illustration to the last. It is not computer graphics either. The ultimate goal is the original vintage print.
Modern pictures are completed with digital data on the computer.
This is a UAP shot with a film camera. However, since no one has succeeded in shooting UAP yet, is it impossible to prove? Or rather, no one has seen it? Even in the US military, the main body has not succeeded yet, just by shooting the shadow of UAP.
********************************************** The history of science is the history of alchemy, and the history of lies is also ww So can't you trust it until you confirm it yourself? Did you confirm the existence of UAP by leaving it on the film? Well, even in the US Navy, it's only monochrome shooting, so ww color shooting may be the first time in history?
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ If you tweet a real UFO picture to a UFO researcher... most of them don't show any interest lol. So does that mean most researchers are fakes? Real UFO pictures are useful for exposing fake researchers lol. :://////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Why are there no UFO images in the world? o Cameras themselves have switched to digital, and their performance has deteriorated drastically compared to film cameras lol o Considering the probability of photographing a UFO, you don't make any money from it lol If you had to put a price on it, it would be about 100 million yen per shot lol
フォトログ表示
