This is a UAP shot with a film camera. However, since no one has succeeded in shooting UAP yet, is it impossible to prove? Or rather, no one has seen it? Even in the US military, the main body has not succeeded yet, just by shooting the shadow of UAP.
********************************************** The history of science is the history of alchemy, and the history of lies is also ww So can't you trust it until you confirm it yourself? Did you confirm the existence of UAP by leaving it on the film? Well, even in the US Navy, it's only monochrome shooting, so ww color shooting may be the first time in history?
"Experiment" ... Real UAP image, {UFO, UA SNS of groups and individuals who saw P, research, etc.} Stick it on and see the reaction. Progress to the present …… Almost no reaction www Is it so brainwashed by the media?
********************************************** Image usage fee US $ 100 Amazon Gift Code
*********************************************
UAP is always wrapped in force field, so it is difficult to shoot w Even with the US Navy Top Gun, even if you say "I see it almost every day", when I look at the image, there is a lot of out-of-focus w At the angle of the sun , The moment the main body was miraculously seen through, I was able to shoot ww
Did the Pentagon's UAP-approved, alien search make sense? In other words, aliens do not come to the earth, are they only monitoring with UAP probes?
///////////////////////////////////////////////// Unidentified flying object eyewitnesses are those who witnessed and filmed an unidentified flying object. UFO researchers and others are those who have not witnessed or filmed.
Interestingly, when the photos of the unidentified flying object were published, there was no response from UFO researchers. So the government doesn't have to cover up.
UFOs with a fairly old film camera. Minolta Alpha 9000, Spain trip, UFO over Girona Cathedral. Film is more sensitive in the infrared region than digital.
This is a UAP shot with a film camera. However, since no one has succeeded in shooting UAP yet, is it impossible to prove? Or rather, no one has seen it? Even in the US military, the main body has not succeeded yet, just by shooting the shadow of UAP.
********************************************** The history of science is the history of alchemy, and the history of lies is also ww So can't you trust it until you confirm it yourself? Did you confirm the existence of UAP by leaving it on the film? Well, even in the US Navy, it's only monochrome shooting, so ww color shooting may be the first time in history?
********************************************** Quiet supersonic aircraft if you can take a clear image, its value is From $ 100,000 to $ 1 million.
Are there aliens malicious and bystanders? At least there are no good ones? * Photographed experimental aircraft in Europe
**********************************************
"Experiment" ... Real UAP image, {UFO, UA SNS of groups and individuals who saw P, research, etc.} Stick it on and see the reaction. Progress to the present …… Almost no reaction www Is it so brainwashed by the media?
The concept of vintage printing is already ww It's because digital pigment prints came out. That is, an original print is input to a personal computer, and a digital print is outputted as a finished product. Still, the original print is a worthwhile ww ＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Even with UAP, sharp images will not come out w You are cheated by infrared shadow puppets w
UAP's powerful weapon is the force field from objects. Even if a submarine collides, it will not break.
US10322827B2 - High frequency gravitational wave generator - ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected.
In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww ++++++++++++++++++++++++
UFOs and UAPs have been witnessed and filmed all over the world,
Unfortunately, most of them were shot with a toy camera, It only captures the light around UFO_UAP. That's probably because most of them were shot at night. So, if you can take a clear image, its value is From $ 100,000 to $ 1 million.
Are there aliens malicious and bystanders? At least there are no good ones?
Pigment photography production is surprisingly . However, as there are many variable elements, like the normal picture, you can not always make the same thing. That's where the interest is divided. This is a photo illustration to the last. It is not computer graphics either. The ultimate goal is the original vintage print.
Modern pictures are completed with digital data on the computer.
This is a UAP shot with a film camera. However, since no one has succeeded in shooting UAP yet, is it impossible to prove? Or rather, no one has seen it? Even in the US military, the main body has not succeeded yet, just by shooting the shadow of UAP.
********************************************** The history of science is the history of alchemy, and the history of lies is also ww So can't you trust it until you confirm it yourself? Did you confirm the existence of UAP by leaving it on the film? Well, even in the US Navy, it's only monochrome shooting, so ww color shooting may be the first time in history?
"Experiment" ... Real UAP image, {UFO, UA SNS of groups and individuals who saw P, research, etc.} Stick it on and see the reaction. Progress to the present …… Almost no reaction www Is it so brainwashed by the media?
**********************************************
Image usage fee US $ 100 Amazon Gift Code
*********************************************
UAP is always wrapped in force field, so it is difficult to shoot w Even with the US Navy Top Gun, even if you say "I see it almost every day", when I look at the image, there is a lot of out-of-focus w At the angle of the sun , The moment the main body was miraculously seen through, I was able to shoot ww
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Even with UAP, sharp images will not come out w You are cheated by infrared shadow puppets w
UAP's powerful weapon is the force field from objects. Even if a submarine collides, it will not break.
US10322827B2 - High frequency gravitational wave generator - ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected.
In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww ++++++++++++++++++++++++ The fact that the United States has approved UAP means that manned UAP may have been successful, that is, it is meaningless to carry out the Artemis program, which allows it to pass through the Van Allen belt unscathed.
++++++++++++++++++++++++ Landing a NASA-developed UAP on an asteroid, using gravity lessen or gyro navigation to deflect its orbit or make a soft landing on any surface? In other words, can you develop planetary resources? ++++++++++++++++++++++++
UAP that can realize a planetary missile that can be guided to any point on the earth
In fact, unidentified flying objects, UAPs, etc. in books are not captured in the photographs. U.S. Navy UAP data may have been tampered with? *************************** Is the real UAP image not coming out because the Pentagon is buying it? If so, will this image be bought for $ 100,000? Please pay by Paypal for the transfer. mation disclosure by the US Department of Defense part of that?
Are unidentified flying objects under blackout worldwide? Are authorities repeatedly hiding information? Is it just light or ghosts that are reported? Why don't everyone shoot when they have a camera?
******************************
Modern pictures are completed with digital data on the computer. Classical technique photography consists of an amalog camera, film, and finally on paper
フォトログ表示
