#UAP in Spain 1995 Minolta Alpha Camera-Kodachrome film*
The UFO was called #Flying Saucer, but this UAP is probably a #Flying Cup, no matter how you look at it.
At the bottom of the object, a layer of atmosphere like a force field is formed. # UAP ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ https://youtu.be/y0i-PLDyMBQ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The actual color of the UAP shot on Kodachrome film is unknown. This is because older scanners do not analyze Kodachrome.
#UAP announced by the US Department of Defense A 35mm reversal image taken more clearly and three-dimensionally? Is it metallic and has a hollow structure in the center? A streak pattern can be seen on the body of the object.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ UFO sightings are every day, but ... Most of them are illusions? So it's rarely filmed. There are movies, but most of them are edited?
US10322827B2 - High frequency gravitational wave generator - ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected.
In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww +++++++++++++++++++++
In general, UFO photos are blurred out? Is it because there
is still no UFO photo in focus? If there is, it will be
recovered by the Pentagon, right?
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
In the original image of UFO, it is quite small and hard to
see.
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ Are real UFO photos unpopular with high-resolution
processing? Conversely, if you do low-resolution processing,
access jumps tenfold? Fake UFO photos are popular w Is
this the same as a UFO researcher not owning a single photo
of a real UFO?
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ The reason why UFOs and UAPs, which are called "space junk",
do not come out is that even if a photographer takes them,
they are treated as "ghosts" and thrown away as "garbage". This "UFO" was also found in the "garbage film" 25 years
With this classic photographic technique, middle tone is hard to appear as a characteristic. Therefore, only the dot screen was exposed and the halftone part could be expressed. This made it look like an ordinary color photograph. ＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃ #ClassicalGumPrint #JazzPigmentPrint
a technique development age record 1985 sensitization agentbasic test.
expansion negative film work. printwork (person, animal, scenery).
#######
#pigmentPhoto
######## Vintage photos are mostly monochrome, with very few color prints.
In the case of color, it will be faded after 30 years. Therefore,
I made organic pigments as color formers. Moreover, the dot type will be the world's first.
########
“External ELF magnetic fields induce electric fields and currents in the body, but their strength is very high. High to cause nerve and muscle stimulation and central nervous system excitability changes. "In other words, when the signal gets stronger ... the investor mind is stimulated." ＄＄＄＄＄＄＄＄
#UAP in Spain 1995 Minolta Alpha Camera-Kodachrome film*
The UFO was called #Flying Saucer, but this UAP is probably a #Flying Cup, no matter how you look at it.
At the bottom of the object, a layer of atmosphere like a force field is formed. # UAP ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ https://youtu.be/y0i-PLDyMBQ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The actual color of the UAP shot on Kodachrome film is unknown. This is because older scanners do not analyze Kodachrome.
#UAP announced by the US Department of Defense A 35mm reversal image taken more clearly and three-dimensionally? Is it metallic and has a hollow structure in the center? A streak pattern can be seen on the body of the object.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ UFO sightings are every day, but ... Most of them are illusions? So it's rarely filmed. There are movies, but most of them are edited?
US10322827B2 - High frequency gravitational wave generator - ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected.
In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww +++++++++++++++++++++
In general, UFO photos are blurred out? Is it because there
is still no UFO photo in focus? If there is, it will be
recovered by the Pentagon, right?
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
In the original image of UFO, it is quite small and hard to
see.
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ Are real UFO photos unpopular with high-resolution
processing? Conversely, if you do low-resolution processing,
access jumps tenfold? Fake UFO photos are popular w Is
this the same as a UFO researcher not owning a single photo
of a real UFO?
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ The reason why UFOs and UAPs, which are called "space junk",
do not come out is that even if a photographer takes them,
they are treated as "ghosts" and thrown away as "garbage". This "UFO" was also found in the "garbage film" 25 years
######## Vintage photos are mostly monochrome, with very few color prints.
In the case of color, it will be faded after 30 years. Therefore,
I made organic pigments as color formers. Moreover, the dot type will be the world's first.
########
“External ELF magnetic fields induce electric fields and currents in the body, but their strength is very high. High to cause nerve and muscle stimulation and central nervous system excitability changes. "In other words, when the signal gets stronger ... the investor mind is stimulated." ＄＄＄＄＄＄＄＄
#UAP in Spain 1995 Minolta Alpha Camera-Kodachrome film*
The UFO was called #Flying Saucer, but this UAP is probably a #Flying Cup, no matter how you look at it.
At the bottom of the object, a layer of atmosphere like a force field is formed. # UAP ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ https://youtu.be/y0i-PLDyMBQ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The actual color of the UAP shot on Kodachrome film is unknown. This is because older scanners do not analyze Kodachrome.
#UAP announced by the US Department of Defense A 35mm reversal image taken more clearly and three-dimensionally? Is it metallic and has a hollow structure in the center? A streak pattern can be seen on the body of the object. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
In general, UFO photos are blurred out? Is it because there
is still no UFO photo in focus? If there is, it will be
recovered by the Pentagon, right?
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
In the original image of UFO, it is quite small and hard to
see.
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ Are real UFO photos unpopular with high-resolution
processing? Conversely, if you do low-resolution processing,
access jumps tenfold? Fake UFO photos are popular w Is
this the same as a UFO researcher not owning a single photo
of a real UFO?
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ The reason why UFOs and UAPs, which are called "space junk",
do not come out is that even if a photographer takes them,
they are treated as "ghosts" and thrown away as "garbage". This "UFO" was also found in the "garbage film" 25 years
US10322827B2 - High frequency gravitational wave generator - ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected.
In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww +++++++++++++++++++++
######## Vintage photos are mostly monochrome, with very few color prints.
In the case of color, it will be faded after 30 years. Therefore,
I made organic pigments as color formers. Moreover, the dot type will be the world's first.
########
“External ELF magnetic fields induce electric fields and currents in the body, but their strength is very high. High to cause nerve and muscle stimulation and central nervous system excitability changes. "In other words, when the signal gets stronger ... the investor mind is stimulated." ＄＄＄＄＄＄＄＄
The UFO was called #Flying Saucer, but this UAP is probably a #Flying Cup, no matter how you look at it.
At the bottom of the object, a layer of atmosphere like a force field is formed. # UAP
The actual color of the UAP shot on Kodachrome film is unknown. This is because older scanners do not analyze Kodachrome.
#UAP announced by the US Department of Defense A 35mm reversal image taken more clearly and three-dimensionally? Is it metallic and has a hollow structure in the center? A streak pattern can be seen on the body of the object. https://youtu.be/y0i-PLDyMBQ
Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected.
In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww
Modern pictures are completed with digital data on the computer.One-ness Classical technique photography consists of an amalog camera, film, and
finally on paper
#######
♯画像 #GumPrint #pigmentPhoto
######## Vintage photos are mostly monochrome, with very few color prints.
In the case of color, it will be faded after 30 years. Therefore,
I made organic pigments as color formers. Moreover, the dot type will be the world's first.
########
“External ELF magnetic fields induce electric fields and currents in the body, but their strength is very high. High to cause nerve and muscle stimulation and central nervous system excitability changes. "In other words, when the signal gets stronger ... the investor mind is stimulated." ＄＄＄＄＄＄＄＄
Thus, the effect is determined, and in digital it is an impossible
finish.
Pigment photography production is surprisingly . However, as there are
many variable elements, like the normal picture, you can not always make
the same thing. That's where the interest is divided. This is a photo
illustration to the last. It is not computer graphics either. The
ultimate goal is the original vintage print.
Here, the original vintage print was made in the 1980's. There is some material that costs it, but it is not available to make
フォトログ表示
